<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shadow Copy Cache Hell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xerxesb.com/2008/shadow-copy-cache-hell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xerxesb.com/2008/shadow-copy-cache-hell/</link>
	<description>&#039;Cause there are some things you just *can&#039;t* get from a book...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 21:47:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xerxes</title>
		<link>http://www.xerxesb.com/2008/shadow-copy-cache-hell/comment-page-1/#comment-1055</link>
		<dc:creator>Xerxes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 22:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xerxesb.com/2008/shadow-copy-cache-hell/#comment-1055</guid>
		<description>Hi Kit,

Sounds like you&#039;re traveling far out of your way to do something which has been done thousands of times before.

Our CC.NET projects call on &lt;a href=&quot;http://nant.sourceforge.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;NAnt tasks&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.finalbuilder.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;FinalBuilder&lt;/a&gt; projects which are delegated the responsibility of doing the clean, prep, build, test and deploy of our code.

CruiseControl is an excellent &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous_Integration&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Continuous Integration&lt;/a&gt; system. It&#039;s a shit &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Build_automation&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;build system&lt;/a&gt;. It suggest calling your NUnit testing from NAnt rather than directly from CC.NET. It provides you with a lot more flexibility, and there &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com.au/search?q=nunit+nant&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;aq=t&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;client=firefox-a&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;countless resources on the net&lt;/a&gt; about how to do exactly this.

TBH, i haven&#039;t encountered the Shadow Copy Cache problem in our integration server, only on development machines.....The NAnt/NUnit combination has worked perfectly for us.

-xerx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kit,</p>
<p>Sounds like you&#8217;re traveling far out of your way to do something which has been done thousands of times before.</p>
<p>Our CC.NET projects call on <a href="http://nant.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow">NAnt tasks</a> or <a href="http://www.finalbuilder.com/" rel="nofollow">FinalBuilder</a> projects which are delegated the responsibility of doing the clean, prep, build, test and deploy of our code.</p>
<p>CruiseControl is an excellent <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous_Integration" rel="nofollow">Continuous Integration</a> system. It&#8217;s a shit <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Build_automation" rel="nofollow">build system</a>. It suggest calling your NUnit testing from NAnt rather than directly from CC.NET. It provides you with a lot more flexibility, and there <a href="http://www.google.com.au/search?q=nunit+nant&#038;ie=utf-8&#038;oe=utf-8&#038;aq=t&#038;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&#038;client=firefox-a" rel="nofollow">countless resources on the net</a> about how to do exactly this.</p>
<p>TBH, i haven&#8217;t encountered the Shadow Copy Cache problem in our integration server, only on development machines&#8230;..The NAnt/NUnit combination has worked perfectly for us.</p>
<p>-xerx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kit</title>
		<link>http://www.xerxesb.com/2008/shadow-copy-cache-hell/comment-page-1/#comment-1054</link>
		<dc:creator>Kit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xerxesb.com/2008/shadow-copy-cache-hell/#comment-1054</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m running into the same issue running NUnit with Cruize Control .NET. 

My problem is CC.net doesnt allow me to pass the /noshadow option to NUnit, and NUnit requires the f***ing cache to be present.  And of course the root of all evil, MSBuild.exe doesn&#039;t cache the build files properly.  All in all its a huge mind blast.

Any suggestions greatly appreciated!

Thanks!
~Kit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m running into the same issue running NUnit with Cruize Control .NET. </p>
<p>My problem is CC.net doesnt allow me to pass the /noshadow option to NUnit, and NUnit requires the f***ing cache to be present.  And of course the root of all evil, MSBuild.exe doesn&#8217;t cache the build files properly.  All in all its a huge mind blast.</p>
<p>Any suggestions greatly appreciated!</p>
<p>Thanks!<br />
~Kit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danni</title>
		<link>http://www.xerxesb.com/2008/shadow-copy-cache-hell/comment-page-1/#comment-991</link>
		<dc:creator>Danni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 04:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xerxesb.com/2008/shadow-copy-cache-hell/#comment-991</guid>
		<description>Awww aren&#039;t you sweet for trying to make the world easier for other developers? Thanks xerxs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awww aren&#8217;t you sweet for trying to make the world easier for other developers? Thanks xerxs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
