http://www.xerxesb.com/2008/nat-winxp-under-virtualbox-has-slow-network-throughput/ 'Cause there are some things you just *can't* get from a book... Fri, 12 Nov 2010 21:27:27 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= http://www.xerxesb.com/2008/nat-winxp-under-virtualbox-has-slow-network-throughput/comment-page-1/#comment-1096 fb Tue, 12 Aug 2008 01:16:30 +0000 http://www.xerxesb.com/2008/nat-winxp-under-virtualbox-has-slow-network-throughput/#comment-1096 If you have a processor with VT extensions (ie. Any of Intel or AMD's latest, within the last year or so) you can run KVM or even VMWare. These might perform better than VirtualBox in the scenario that you are looking for. Also, yes, VMWare can run with or without VT extensions, but you'll get way better performance with the VT extensions. If you have a processor with VT extensions (ie. Any of Intel or AMD’s latest, within the last year or so) you can run KVM or even VMWare. These might perform better than VirtualBox in the scenario that you are looking for. Also, yes, VMWare can run with or without VT extensions, but you’ll get way better performance with the VT extensions.

]]>